User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20121207092215/@comment-88790-20121208150510: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20121207092215/@comment-88790-20121208150510'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
GusF wrote:
GusF wrote:
Line 10: Line 9:


That it's named after a mistake in watching ''Castrovalva'' is somewhat odd.
That it's named after a mistake in watching ''Castrovalva'' is somewhat odd.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121207092215-188432/20121208150510-88790]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:33, 27 April 2023

GusF wrote: If it was a straight choice between TARDIS Information System and TARDIS Wiki, I'd definitely choose the latter as the former seems a bit boring.

But personally I don't really see it as a big issue that the Wiki is named after something that doesn't exist in the Whoniverse.

How so? Shouldn't we be able to justify why the wiki is names the way it's named?

That it's named after a mistake in watching Castrovalva is somewhat odd.