User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1166667-20130401032657: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
SmallerOnTheOutside wrote: | SmallerOnTheOutside wrote: | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
Her ''dying twice on-screen'' is pretty good proof the Doctor is wrong. | Her ''dying twice on-screen'' is pretty good proof the Doctor is wrong. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130401032657-1166667]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:40, 27 April 2023
SmallerOnTheOutside wrote:
42dirou wrote: If The Doctor says she is the same person, she is. Until he says otherwise, which I think he would even agree with... until he doesn't :)
Right... :P
Anyway, the only fact we have at present is the Doctor's word — they are the same woman. And, so far, there is no evidence to the contrary. It would be speculation to assume that he's wrong. Until we have hard evidence that they're different people, he have to go by all we have:
I never knew her name, her full name. Soufflé girl. Oswin. It was her. It was soufflé girl. Again. I never saw her face the first time, with the Daleks. But her voice. It was the same voice. The same woman, twice. And she died. Both times. The same woman!
Her dying twice on-screen is pretty good proof the Doctor is wrong.
