User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1166667-20130401034942: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
SmallerOnTheOutside wrote: | SmallerOnTheOutside wrote: | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
Pretty much where I was going with it too. There's (thus far) no logic behind claiming the three Oswalds are the same person, we have to separate them. | Pretty much where I was going with it too. There's (thus far) no logic behind claiming the three Oswalds are the same person, we have to separate them. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130401034942-1166667]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:40, 27 April 2023
SmallerOnTheOutside wrote: That's not the point. I'm not claiming that she's anything like a Ganger. My point is that, applying real-world logic, Gangers must be the same as the originals, as Gangers don't exist. That's just plain wrong. Applying Whoniverse concepts, we know that they're distinct beings.
Same here: the Claras must be distinct, because people dying and then reappearing a century later don't exist. That's also just as wrong.
Pretty much where I was going with it too. There's (thus far) no logic behind claiming the three Oswalds are the same person, we have to separate them.
