User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1166667-20130402160640: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1166667-20130402160640'''
Let me put it this way:
Let me put it this way:


Line 5: Line 4:


Is there a reason we cannot put, somewhere in the bio of each, that the Doctor believes them to be the same woman?  It acknowledges that he thinks (at least at present) that they are the same, without committing to it being fact.  Would that not satisfy his statement?
Is there a reason we cannot put, somewhere in the bio of each, that the Doctor believes them to be the same woman?  It acknowledges that he thinks (at least at present) that they are the same, without committing to it being fact.  Would that not satisfy his statement?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130402160640-1166667]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:41, 27 April 2023

Let me put it this way:

We do not yet have proof that Oswin, Clara Oswin, and Clara are the same woman. We have possibilities and hypotheses, but no actual proof as of yet. Meanwhile, basic facts of humanity preclude her from dying in the 19th century, living in the 21st century, and dying in the far future. There are possibly workarounds to this, but they have yet to be presented or explained in-universe.

Is there a reason we cannot put, somewhere in the bio of each, that the Doctor believes them to be the same woman? It acknowledges that he thinks (at least at present) that they are the same, without committing to it being fact. Would that not satisfy his statement?