User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1166667-20130402202700: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1166667-20130402202700'''
Actually, that's a very good point.  If the Doctor is wrong, all it takes (aside from splitting the article - oof) is suggesting that the Doctor "once believed", etc.
Actually, that's a very good point.  If the Doctor is wrong, all it takes (aside from splitting the article - oof) is suggesting that the Doctor "once believed", etc.


Sounds good to me.
Sounds good to me.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130402202700-1166667]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:41, 27 April 2023

Actually, that's a very good point. If the Doctor is wrong, all it takes (aside from splitting the article - oof) is suggesting that the Doctor "once believed", etc.

Sounds good to me.