User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1293767-20130402170602: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-1293767-20130402170602'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
SmallerOnTheOutside wrote:
SmallerOnTheOutside wrote:
Line 8: Line 7:


You cannot provide proof that they are the same woman without woeful amounts of speculation and faulty "proof."
You cannot provide proof that they are the same woman without woeful amounts of speculation and faulty "proof."
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130402170602-1293767]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:42, 27 April 2023

SmallerOnTheOutside wrote: according to our only source, they're one person as well.

Factually incorrect. What you're erroneously counting as fact is The Doctor's speculation. Our sources are Clara Oswald, Oswin Oswald, and Clara Oswin Oswald which all refute The Doctor's speculation.

You cannot provide proof that they are the same woman without woeful amounts of speculation and faulty "proof."