User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-188432-20130331203546: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-188432-20130331203546'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Witoki wrote:
Witoki wrote:
Line 9: Line 8:
</div>
</div>
See rule one of our [[four little rules]].  For a source to be valid, it '''must''' be a story.  No exceptions.
See rule one of our [[four little rules]].  For a source to be valid, it '''must''' be a story.  No exceptions.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130331203546-188432]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:43, 27 April 2023

Witoki wrote:

CzechOut wrote: No, it doesn't. That's out of universe information, and therefore not admissible in in-universe articles.

I don't see how it could possibly be inadmissible. It's not a speculative statement, it's the BBC website stating, quite plainly, that Clara from A Prequel grows up to be Clara from Bells.

See rule one of our four little rules. For a source to be valid, it must be a story. No exceptions.