User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130401034251: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That's not the point. I'm not claiming that she's anything like a Ganger. My point is that, applying real-world logic, Gangers ''must'' be the same as the originals, as Gangers don't exist. That's just plain wrong. Applying Whoniverse concepts, we know that they're distinct beings. | That's not the point. I'm not claiming that she's anything like a Ganger. My point is that, applying real-world logic, Gangers ''must'' be the same as the originals, as Gangers don't exist. That's just plain wrong. Applying Whoniverse concepts, we know that they're distinct beings. | ||
Same here: the Claras must be distinct, because people dying and then reappearing a century later don't exist. That's also just as wrong. | Same here: the Claras must be distinct, because people dying and then reappearing a century later don't exist. That's also just as wrong. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130401034251-26975268]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:45, 27 April 2023
That's not the point. I'm not claiming that she's anything like a Ganger. My point is that, applying real-world logic, Gangers must be the same as the originals, as Gangers don't exist. That's just plain wrong. Applying Whoniverse concepts, we know that they're distinct beings.
Same here: the Claras must be distinct, because people dying and then reappearing a century later don't exist. That's also just as wrong.
