User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-4189499-20130402112422: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-4189499-20130402112422'''
It just seems weird to me to name an article something which isn't exactly true for 2/3 of it, especially as the Clara we will probably be seeing most of isn't the one with the middle name.  Look, I could live with it all being under that blanket term, but I think it would be better not to name an article something which, while it can be adapted to suit all incarnations, isn't actually perfectly true for 2 of them.  But if you disagree, it's not a major point and not one I'm in the mood to keep on arguing.
It just seems weird to me to name an article something which isn't exactly true for 2/3 of it, especially as the Clara we will probably be seeing most of isn't the one with the middle name.  Look, I could live with it all being under that blanket term, but I think it would be better not to name an article something which, while it can be adapted to suit all incarnations, isn't actually perfectly true for 2 of them.  But if you disagree, it's not a major point and not one I'm in the mood to keep on arguing.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130402112422-4189499]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:48, 27 April 2023

It just seems weird to me to name an article something which isn't exactly true for 2/3 of it, especially as the Clara we will probably be seeing most of isn't the one with the middle name. Look, I could live with it all being under that blanket term, but I think it would be better not to name an article something which, while it can be adapted to suit all incarnations, isn't actually perfectly true for 2 of them. But if you disagree, it's not a major point and not one I'm in the mood to keep on arguing.