User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-6433721-20130401035241: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-6433721-20130401035241'''
I'm just saying we need to agree on a default, which for the sake of simplicity (and not arguing versions of the Doctor every time he walks on screen, oj, he just did it again didn't he?) should be "they’re all the same".  
I'm just saying we need to agree on a default, which for the sake of simplicity (and not arguing versions of the Doctor every time he walks on screen, oj, he just did it again didn't he?) should be "they’re all the same".  


Then we can argue about which ones have enough evidence to split (and I think future Dalek Oswin, yes, and past Snowmen Clara, yes.)
Then we can argue about which ones have enough evidence to split (and I think future Dalek Oswin, yes, and past Snowmen Clara, yes.)
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130401035241-6433721]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:50, 27 April 2023

I'm just saying we need to agree on a default, which for the sake of simplicity (and not arguing versions of the Doctor every time he walks on screen, oj, he just did it again didn't he?) should be "they’re all the same".

Then we can argue about which ones have enough evidence to split (and I think future Dalek Oswin, yes, and past Snowmen Clara, yes.)