User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-6433721-20130401042142: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-6433721-20130401042142'''
Your tone is borderline insulting, SOTO. Watch it.
Your tone is borderline insulting, SOTO. Watch it.


Line 5: Line 4:


As you may notice above, several users feel that the competing narrative evidence of the two deaths is at least as strong a statement.
As you may notice above, several users feel that the competing narrative evidence of the two deaths is at least as strong a statement.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130401042142-6433721]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:50, 27 April 2023

Your tone is borderline insulting, SOTO. Watch it.

I take it, then, you're in favour of one page? You didn't seem to be arguing that.

As you may notice above, several users feel that the competing narrative evidence of the two deaths is at least as strong a statement.