User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-753926-20130402213038: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
ComicBookGoddess wrote: | ComicBookGoddess wrote: | ||
Line 33: | Line 32: | ||
Does that settle it? | Does that settle it? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130402213038-753926]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 21:51, 27 April 2023
ComicBookGoddess wrote: There are dead bodies when everything is over. Even if they'd been different people, there are separate dead bodies to account for. So, I still say 3 articles.
In any case, you're both continuing to argue in circles ad infinitum.
Here's how the comments have come down so far:
- SOTO - 1 article
- Witoki - 3 articles
- MrSiriusBlack - defer the question
- Mewiet - 3 articles
- Tangerineduel - ? 1 article
- Imamadmad - 3 articles, will compromise to 1
- Czechout - 1 article
- Shambala108 - 1 article
- Trebligonica - 1 article
- CultofSkaro - 1 article
- TardisTraveler - 1 article
- Ottselspy25 - 3 articles
- 42Dirou - 3 articles (broccoli!)
- Geek Mythology - 3 articles ?
- Oh, yeah, me, - 3 articles
So, I count: 7 for one article 7 for three articles
Ouch. Unless I miscounted. Anybody else want to weigh in or change their vote?
For what it's worth, I've been through some of the arguments, and changed my mind, making it 8/6 in favour of one article.
Does that settle it?