User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-753926-20130402213038: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-753926-20130402213038'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
ComicBookGoddess wrote:
ComicBookGoddess wrote:
Line 33: Line 32:


Does that settle it?
Does that settle it?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130402213038-753926]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:51, 27 April 2023

ComicBookGoddess wrote: There are dead bodies when everything is over. Even if they'd been different people, there are separate dead bodies to account for. So, I still say 3 articles.

In any case, you're both continuing to argue in circles ad infinitum.

Here's how the comments have come down so far:

  • SOTO - 1 article
  • Witoki - 3 articles
  • MrSiriusBlack - defer the question
  • Mewiet - 3 articles
  • Tangerineduel - ? 1 article
  • Imamadmad - 3 articles, will compromise to 1
  • Czechout - 1 article
  • Shambala108 - 1 article
  • Trebligonica - 1 article
  • CultofSkaro - 1 article
  • TardisTraveler - 1 article
  • Ottselspy25 - 3 articles
  • 42Dirou - 3 articles (broccoli!)
  • Geek Mythology - 3 articles ?
  • Oh, yeah, me, - 3 articles

So, I count: 7 for one article 7 for three articles

Ouch. Unless I miscounted. Anybody else want to weigh in or change their vote?

For what it's worth, I've been through some of the arguments, and changed my mind, making it 8/6 in favour of one article.

Does that settle it?