User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-88790-20130131155908: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-88790-20130131155908'''
Given the complexity of Clara/Oswin's character I feel it would be premature to combine the articles until we have further proof of the characters single nature.  
Given the complexity of Clara/Oswin's character I feel it would be premature to combine the articles until we have further proof of the characters single nature.  


Line 5: Line 4:


However, if we can agree on a structure for a combined article then I am not against a merger of the articles (I'll likely be doing the merger).
However, if we can agree on a structure for a combined article then I am not against a merger of the articles (I'll likely be doing the merger).
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130131155908-88790]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:51, 27 April 2023

Given the complexity of Clara/Oswin's character I feel it would be premature to combine the articles until we have further proof of the characters single nature.

We lack at the moment the 'glue' of an explanation to glue the varied accounts of Clara/Oswin's life together. I'm concerned this lack of information will lead to speculation on the article and be detrimental to the information on such a prominent article.

However, if we can agree on a structure for a combined article then I am not against a merger of the articles (I'll likely be doing the merger).