User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130304024346/@comment-188432-20130307193358: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130304024346/@comment-188432-20130307193358'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
OttselSpy25 wrote:
OttselSpy25 wrote:
Line 8: Line 7:


I'm uncertain why you'd be going for jelly babies to represent Four, anyway.  Jelly babies were introduced by Two, not Four.  Surely a scarf would make more sense?
I'm uncertain why you'd be going for jelly babies to represent Four, anyway.  Jelly babies were introduced by Two, not Four.  Surely a scarf would make more sense?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130304024346-188432/20130307193358-188432]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:53, 27 April 2023

OttselSpy25 wrote: Can I again ask of Czech's opinion of this? I feel like every jelly baby needs a better outline but otherwise it's good -- how do you feel?

Fourth Doctor logo alt 2.png

I didn't think I had to specifically comment upon it. But I guess I do. It again violates the design guidelines we're going for with this project: it obscures the main logo. Also, no offence, but I really have no idea what it's supposed to be. Unless you told me it was "a bag of jelly babies that had been tipped over", I'd have been clueless.

I'm uncertain why you'd be going for jelly babies to represent Four, anyway. Jelly babies were introduced by Two, not Four. Surely a scarf would make more sense?