User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130515224647/@comment-188432-20130516202841: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130515224647/@comment-188432-20130516202841'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
ZivKarni3 wrote:
ZivKarni3 wrote:
Line 6: Line 5:
</div>
</div>
Please define how you think it would be a mess on ''this'' wiki.  That's the only concern of this thread.  Existing [[w:c:he.doctorwho]] links would still be useful here, as all these date variants ''will'' be linked.  So you might arrive from he.doctorwho at [[1 May]], but there'll be a big link there to the other 1 May pages.
Please define how you think it would be a mess on ''this'' wiki.  That's the only concern of this thread.  Existing [[w:c:he.doctorwho]] links would still be useful here, as all these date variants ''will'' be linked.  So you might arrive from he.doctorwho at [[1 May]], but there'll be a big link there to the other 1 May pages.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130515224647-188432/20130516202841-188432]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 22:09, 27 April 2023

ZivKarni3 wrote: No! I don't think you should do that, it will create a mess in this Wiki and in others. If you wish to do the split thing, I think it's better to create sections in the article.

Please define how you think it would be a mess on this wiki. That's the only concern of this thread. Existing w:c:he.doctorwho links would still be useful here, as all these date variants will be linked. So you might arrive from he.doctorwho at 1 May, but there'll be a big link there to the other 1 May pages.