User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20151229103324/@comment-5918438-20151229124906: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Also, if this were at all implemented, I think we ''would'' make it convention to create these redirects for every dabbed character who appears in more than one medium. Rules need to be clear. If we say dab the article with the story in which the character first appeared, and then create redirects with dabs for each first story in other media, then we still have a clear rule. | Also, if this were at all implemented, I think we ''would'' make it convention to create these redirects for every dabbed character who appears in more than one medium. Rules need to be clear. If we say dab the article with the story in which the character first appeared, and then create redirects with dabs for each first story in other media, then we still have a clear rule. | ||
This is certainly an ''interesting'' new idea brought to the table. I can't say yet whether or not I support it. | This is certainly an ''interesting'' new idea brought to the table. I can't say yet whether or not I support it. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151229103324-24894325/20151229124906-5918438]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:28, 27 April 2023
Also, if this were at all implemented, I think we would make it convention to create these redirects for every dabbed character who appears in more than one medium. Rules need to be clear. If we say dab the article with the story in which the character first appeared, and then create redirects with dabs for each first story in other media, then we still have a clear rule.
This is certainly an interesting new idea brought to the table. I can't say yet whether or not I support it.
