User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20161219001033/@comment-5918438-20161219003800: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20161219001033/@comment-5918438-20161219003800'''
(They're generally called navboxes) :)
(They're generally called navboxes) :)


Line 11: Line 10:


It might also be a possibility to include a transclusion (ha- trans/inclusion, I somehow only just got that) of the other relevant templates in the main {{tlx|NS}} (or, really as it should be named, {{tlx|BFNS}} or {{tlx|BF NS}}). That way, there's minimal maintenance, as you only ever need update one template.
It might also be a possibility to include a transclusion (ha- trans/inclusion, I somehow only just got that) of the other relevant templates in the main {{tlx|NS}} (or, really as it should be named, {{tlx|BFNS}} or {{tlx|BF NS}}). That way, there's minimal maintenance, as you only ever need update one template.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20161219001033-24894325/20161219003800-5918438]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 22:31, 27 April 2023

(They're generally called navboxes) :)

So if we separate from the main New Series navigation what you suggest:

  1. Is it going to be done in a uniform fashion?
  2. Are there going to be any links, perhaps in a note at the bottom, to the other ranges that BF also considers part of the range?

BF is always really unclear about ranges, and changes categorisations all the time. It's all very confusing. We really need to pick something that's consistent and that will work for us in the years to come. Would it make sense to make a template for every new series Doctor featured?

I will consider the specifics here again in the very near future.

It might also be a possibility to include a transclusion (ha- trans/inclusion, I somehow only just got that) of the other relevant templates in the main {{NS}} (or, really as it should be named, {{BFNS}} or {{BF NS}}). That way, there's minimal maintenance, as you only ever need update one template.