User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20151024182247/@comment-25041817-20151024212814: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
No, I was agreeing with; it is taking up space and more about the previous Doctors than the current ones. Truth be told, I was only upholding them because the Fourth Doctor's one was inexplicably still intact. Now that I understand the reason for it, I'm all for bygones being bygones. | No, I was agreeing with; it is taking up space and more about the previous Doctors than the current ones. Truth be told, I was only upholding them because the Fourth Doctor's one was inexplicably still intact. Now that I understand the reason for it, I'm all for bygones being bygones. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151024182247-25041817/20151024212814-25041817]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:35, 27 April 2023
No, I was agreeing with; it is taking up space and more about the previous Doctors than the current ones. Truth be told, I was only upholding them because the Fourth Doctor's one was inexplicably still intact. Now that I understand the reason for it, I'm all for bygones being bygones.
