User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25117610-20161123164500/@comment-1827503-20161221224957: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
OncomingStorm12th wrote: | OncomingStorm12th wrote: | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Spoilers don't matter, because we can't discuss it until it's released. It simply makes no sense to use "spoilers" as an attempt to regulate article titles. | Spoilers don't matter, because we can't discuss it until it's released. It simply makes no sense to use "spoilers" as an attempt to regulate article titles. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20161123164500-25117610/20161221224957-1827503]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:37, 27 April 2023
OncomingStorm12th wrote: Yeah, with that I must agree: boxset names can give away plot details as much as story names (some might give plot details, while ohters don't), so we should probabbly let them off the thread anyway.
"UNIT: Extinction" won't lead anyone to think about Autons, but SOTO's example is a good one where the title can lead to details.
Spoilers don't matter, because we can't discuss it until it's released. It simply makes no sense to use "spoilers" as an attempt to regulate article titles.
