User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25117610-20161123164500/@comment-25117610-20161220233048: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Amorkuz wrote: | Amorkuz wrote: | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Being very honest, I misread your previous post, and though that you were "in favour" of keeping the prefixes. Now, with this clarification, I must say: yes, we indeed agree. | Being very honest, I misread your previous post, and though that you were "in favour" of keeping the prefixes. Now, with this clarification, I must say: yes, we indeed agree. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20161123164500-25117610/20161220233048-25117610]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:37, 27 April 2023
Amorkuz wrote: I think, in the end, we actually agree. You are saying that the titles do not always make sense on their own. I am saying that whatever sense they make, the additional meanings brought by the prefix are not worth fighting for.
So, yes, I agree that all UNIT stories and boxsets (old and new) should be named without the prefix "UNIT". Then the rules described in that old thread would finally explain the names of all Big Finish audio stories on this wiki.
Being very honest, I misread your previous post, and though that you were "in favour" of keeping the prefixes. Now, with this clarification, I must say: yes, we indeed agree.
