User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26845762-20170222025243/@comment-5918438-20170304193123: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26845762-20170222025243/@comment-5918438-20170304193123'''
Just to be clear, for something to be valid, it must be a ''story'', a ''narrative''. DWM illustrations for audio stories can certainly argued to be part of that story, and a visual representation of it, but promotional art in general is..wait for it..not a story. And [[four little rules|only ''stories'' count]].
Just to be clear, for something to be valid, it must be a ''story'', a ''narrative''. DWM illustrations for audio stories can certainly argued to be part of that story, and a visual representation of it, but promotional art in general is..wait for it..not a story. And [[four little rules|only ''stories'' count]].


''Legacy'' artwork which is featured in DWM is no more valid than images on merchandise packaging or playing cards. It can go in a BTS section, if that's important to you, but by no stretch, really, can such illustrations pass [[T:VALID]]. We're not [[w:c:starwars]].
''Legacy'' artwork which is featured in DWM is no more valid than images on merchandise packaging or playing cards. It can go in a BTS section, if that's important to you, but by no stretch, really, can such illustrations pass [[T:VALID]]. We're not [[w:c:starwars]].
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20170222025243-26845762/20170304193123-5918438]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 22:46, 27 April 2023

Just to be clear, for something to be valid, it must be a story, a narrative. DWM illustrations for audio stories can certainly argued to be part of that story, and a visual representation of it, but promotional art in general is..wait for it..not a story. And only stories count.

Legacy artwork which is featured in DWM is no more valid than images on merchandise packaging or playing cards. It can go in a BTS section, if that's important to you, but by no stretch, really, can such illustrations pass T:VALID. We're not w:c:starwars.