User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26975268-20130201045831/@comment-26975268-20130202012029: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26975268-20130201045831/@comment-26975268-20130202012029'''
1) I agree that including a one word description of the individual would be extremely useful, and, especially now that we got rid of what they wrote/who they played, etc..., it helps you get a basic sense of what they did and who they were/are. I think it would add a lot to the clarity of that section. Do you object to me adding job titles to all births and deaths?
1) I agree that including a one word description of the individual would be extremely useful, and, especially now that we got rid of what they wrote/who they played, etc..., it helps you get a basic sense of what they did and who they were/are. I think it would add a lot to the clarity of that section. Do you object to me adding job titles to all births and deaths?


Line 7: Line 6:
* [[1981]] - [[Victor Carin]] died.
* [[1981]] - [[Victor Carin]] died.
Right?
Right?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130201045831-26975268/20130202012029-26975268]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 22:50, 27 April 2023

1) I agree that including a one word description of the individual would be extremely useful, and, especially now that we got rid of what they wrote/who they played, etc..., it helps you get a basic sense of what they did and who they were/are. I think it would add a lot to the clarity of that section. Do you object to me adding job titles to all births and deaths?

2) I'm assuming the above applies to how they died too, right? So instead of:

I'd just put:

Right?