User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-28743561-20191009194033/@comment-6032121-20191101194816: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
Tag: Disambiguation links
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-28743561-20191009194033/@comment-6032121-20191101194816'''
Do you agree that there should be a separate ''prefix'' for citing the animations, though? So you could have, say:
Do you agree that there should be a separate ''prefix'' for citing the animations, though? So you could have, say:
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Line 12: Line 11:


Best of both worlds: no confusing page splits, ''but'' we get a way to source information original to the recons.
Best of both worlds: no confusing page splits, ''but'' we get a way to source information original to the recons.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20191009194033-28743561/20191101194816-6032121]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 23:04, 27 April 2023

Do you agree that there should be a separate prefix for citing the animations, though? So you could have, say:

With the source, in the page code, looking like this:

([[RECON]]: ''[[The Power of the Daleks (TV story)#Animated version|The Power of the Daleks]]'')

Best of both worlds: no confusing page splits, but we get a way to source information original to the recons.