User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-29078-20150209172154/@comment-188432-20150326024431: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm for it. And, as Tangerineduel has noted, we should also have one for Iris. And if there were a snowball effect and you did one for all the companions, I personally wouldn't have a problem. I think the old categorical guideline applies: as long as your category has (the potential for) three members, then it can be created. Now, I'm not saying that every 3-member notion should be put into a category, but as we've no objection to the "planets visited by the Doctor" categories — and because there's no graceful way to collect this data through an [[T:SMW|SMW]] template — I don't have a problem with "planets visited by <whoever>" for any long-serving recurring character, really. | I'm for it. And, as Tangerineduel has noted, we should also have one for Iris. And if there were a snowball effect and you did one for all the companions, I personally wouldn't have a problem. I think the old categorical guideline applies: as long as your category has (the potential for) three members, then it can be created. Now, I'm not saying that every 3-member notion should be put into a category, but as we've no objection to the "planets visited by the Doctor" categories — and because there's no graceful way to collect this data through an [[T:SMW|SMW]] template — I don't have a problem with "planets visited by <whoever>" for any long-serving recurring character, really. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20150209172154-29078/20150326024431-188432]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:05, 27 April 2023
I'm for it. And, as Tangerineduel has noted, we should also have one for Iris. And if there were a snowball effect and you did one for all the companions, I personally wouldn't have a problem. I think the old categorical guideline applies: as long as your category has (the potential for) three members, then it can be created. Now, I'm not saying that every 3-member notion should be put into a category, but as we've no objection to the "planets visited by the Doctor" categories — and because there's no graceful way to collect this data through an SMW template — I don't have a problem with "planets visited by <whoever>" for any long-serving recurring character, really.
