User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-3030984-20130109133452: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO | Forum Archive
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|The Panopticon/TV prefix template}} | |||
I'd like to propose the creation of a template to allow editors to create easy links to different episodes in the correct format. | I'd like to propose the creation of a template to allow editors to create easy links to different episodes in the correct format. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
and should hopefully work with all our TV story articles, thanks to all the articles being disambiguated with the same suffix (and the recent renaming of [[Doctor Who (TV story)|the TV movie]] to match). | and should hopefully work with all our TV story articles, thanks to all the articles being disambiguated with the same suffix (and the recent renaming of [[Doctor Who (TV story)|the TV movie]] to match). | ||
Thoughts? | Thoughts? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130109133452-3030984]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:06, 27 April 2023
I'd like to propose the creation of a template to allow editors to create easy links to different episodes in the correct format.
Currently, the following is used:
([[TV]]: ''[[The Snowmen (TV story)|The Snowmen]]'')
which produces: (TV: The Snowmen)
I propose the creation of Template:TV, so that {{TV|The Snowmen}} produces the same result.
The template code would be (obviously):
([[TV]]: ''[[{{{1|}}} (TV story)|{{{1|}}}]]'')
and should hopefully work with all our TV story articles, thanks to all the articles being disambiguated with the same suffix (and the recent renaming of the TV movie to match).
Thoughts?
