User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-31010985-20180428165444/@comment-33695797-20200107205232: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Even so, I feel "alternate reality" and "alternate validity" don't work; the former implies a parallel universe, which we have no evidence of, and the latter simply doesn't make sense. Validity is defined as "the quality of being valid". By the way, I got "generally agreed on" from this thread itself— do a Control-F search for "continuity" on this page and you may see what I mean. | Even so, I feel "alternate reality" and "alternate validity" don't work; the former implies a parallel universe, which we have no evidence of, and the latter simply doesn't make sense. Validity is defined as "the quality of being valid". By the way, I got "generally agreed on" from this thread itself— do a Control-F search for "continuity" on this page and you may see what I mean. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20180428165444-31010985/20200107205232-33695797]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:08, 27 April 2023
Even so, I feel "alternate reality" and "alternate validity" don't work; the former implies a parallel universe, which we have no evidence of, and the latter simply doesn't make sense. Validity is defined as "the quality of being valid". By the way, I got "generally agreed on" from this thread itself— do a Control-F search for "continuity" on this page and you may see what I mean.
