User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150822192856/@comment-4028641-20150902183032: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150822192856/@comment-4028641-20150902183032'''
I think that it is possible to have a plot description on the main page, but a less detailed one than on the sub sections. Sorta like the descriptions you'll find on the early DWM comics right now. Only a few paragraphs that cover the whole story. As for references and continuity, I'm more prone to keep those on the desperate pages. It forms a lot more organized environment and makes it seem a little better in the long run.
I think that it is possible to have a plot description on the main page, but a less detailed one than on the sub sections. Sorta like the descriptions you'll find on the early DWM comics right now. Only a few paragraphs that cover the whole story. As for references and continuity, I'm more prone to keep those on the desperate pages. It forms a lot more organized environment and makes it seem a little better in the long run.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20150822192856-4028641/20150902183032-4028641]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 23:16, 27 April 2023

I think that it is possible to have a plot description on the main page, but a less detailed one than on the sub sections. Sorta like the descriptions you'll find on the early DWM comics right now. Only a few paragraphs that cover the whole story. As for references and continuity, I'm more prone to keep those on the desperate pages. It forms a lot more organized environment and makes it seem a little better in the long run.