User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150822192856/@comment-5545417-20150902182439: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In my opinion, we should have had all the narrative information (plot, references, continuity) on the main page ''[[Four Doctors (comic story)]]'' and the technical, "merchandising" details of the single issues in each issue page ([[FD 1]], [[FD 2]], etc.). | In my opinion, we should have had all the narrative information (plot, references, continuity) on the main page ''[[Four Doctors (comic story)]]'' and the technical, "merchandising" details of the single issues in each issue page ([[FD 1]], [[FD 2]], etc.). | ||
Instead, like we are doing, when we put a reference to the storyline, we link to an umbrella-page with no narrative information, nor clues in what issue that reference refers to. | Instead, like we are doing, when we put a reference to the storyline, we link to an umbrella-page with no narrative information, nor clues in what issue that reference refers to. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20150822192856-4028641/20150902182439-5545417]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:16, 27 April 2023
In my opinion, we should have had all the narrative information (plot, references, continuity) on the main page Four Doctors (comic story) and the technical, "merchandising" details of the single issues in each issue page (FD 1, FD 2, etc.). Instead, like we are doing, when we put a reference to the storyline, we link to an umbrella-page with no narrative information, nor clues in what issue that reference refers to.
