User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151101035254/@comment-24894325-20151119083429: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) Tag: Disambiguation links |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
RogerAckroydLives wrote: | RogerAckroydLives wrote: | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
Also a procedural suggestion. Whenever discussing a particular page name, it is better to mention the set of page names from which it is taken: the same name may be unambiguous in one set but ambiguous in another (of course, the ideal is to choose names that are unambiguous in every reasonable set, but whether this is possible in this Moffat world, I don't know). | Also a procedural suggestion. Whenever discussing a particular page name, it is better to mention the set of page names from which it is taken: the same name may be unambiguous in one set but ambiguous in another (of course, the ideal is to choose names that are unambiguous in every reasonable set, but whether this is possible in this Moffat world, I don't know). | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151101035254-4028641/20151119083429-24894325]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:25, 27 April 2023
RogerAckroydLives wrote: It is almost definitely worthwhile to remain with the four pages we have. [...] So my vote is for pages to be written and maintained for Osgood, Petronella Osgood, Zygon Osgood, Osgood (hybrid) or whatever we may choose to call it, and Bonnie (The Zygon Invasion).
To prevent misunderstanding, my vote was for the same pages (with different names): I simply forgot to mention the disambiguation page Osgood (not that anyone doubted that's needed).
Also a procedural suggestion. Whenever discussing a particular page name, it is better to mention the set of page names from which it is taken: the same name may be unambiguous in one set but ambiguous in another (of course, the ideal is to choose names that are unambiguous in every reasonable set, but whether this is possible in this Moffat world, I don't know).
