User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4139960-20130129190934: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|The Panopticon/In-universe websites fails the four valid source rules?}} | |||
This may even be bleeding obvious, but I just need pointing out anyway. As the [[four little rules]] say, only stories count. | This may even be bleeding obvious, but I just need pointing out anyway. As the [[four little rules]] say, only stories count. | ||
Now, obviously, anything of the [[UNIT website]] or [[Who is Doctor Who?]] that's onscreen could be sourced to those episodes that show computer screens of those sites, but the [[Torchwood website]]; later instalments of [[Clive Finch|Clive]]'s website after Mickey took over; most anything prefixed with WEB...does this mean, per our rules, we shouldn't source them (aside from the aforementioned onscreen stuff)? [[User:CzechOut]] points out [[Forum:Is Torchwood series 2 really split into episodes set in 2008 and 2009?|here]] that at least the Torchwood website is in no way narrative. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 19:09, January 29, 2013 (UTC) | Now, obviously, anything of the [[UNIT website]] or [[Who is Doctor Who?]] that's onscreen could be sourced to those episodes that show computer screens of those sites, but the [[Torchwood website]]; later instalments of [[Clive Finch|Clive]]'s website after Mickey took over; most anything prefixed with WEB...does this mean, per our rules, we shouldn't source them (aside from the aforementioned onscreen stuff)? [[User:CzechOut]] points out [[Forum:Is Torchwood series 2 really split into episodes set in 2008 and 2009?|here]] that at least the Torchwood website is in no way narrative. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 19:09, January 29, 2013 (UTC) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129190934-4139960]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 23:29, 27 April 2023
This may even be bleeding obvious, but I just need pointing out anyway. As the four little rules say, only stories count.
Now, obviously, anything of the UNIT website or Who is Doctor Who? that's onscreen could be sourced to those episodes that show computer screens of those sites, but the Torchwood website; later instalments of Clive's website after Mickey took over; most anything prefixed with WEB...does this mean, per our rules, we shouldn't source them (aside from the aforementioned onscreen stuff)? User:CzechOut points out here that at least the Torchwood website is in no way narrative. -- Tybort (talk page) 19:09, January 29, 2013 (UTC)