User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4139960-20130129190934/@comment-188432-20130131015215: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That's fair enough. Almost always when I refer to an "in-universe page", I'm not talking about usage on the BTS section. Thus, when I recommended removal from in-universe page, I didn't mean to imply a ban on their BTS usage. But if they ''are'' cited on a BTS, care should be taken to define ''when'' the reference was valid. We probably do need to require some sort of "accessed on" date for not just these web resources, but ''any'' web citation. This is probably second nature to you, Josiah, but we've never made dating of web references required here. | That's fair enough. Almost always when I refer to an "in-universe page", I'm not talking about usage on the BTS section. Thus, when I recommended removal from in-universe page, I didn't mean to imply a ban on their BTS usage. But if they ''are'' cited on a BTS, care should be taken to define ''when'' the reference was valid. We probably do need to require some sort of "accessed on" date for not just these web resources, but ''any'' web citation. This is probably second nature to you, Josiah, but we've never made dating of web references required here. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129190934-4139960/20130131015215-188432]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:29, 27 April 2023
That's fair enough. Almost always when I refer to an "in-universe page", I'm not talking about usage on the BTS section. Thus, when I recommended removal from in-universe page, I didn't mean to imply a ban on their BTS usage. But if they are cited on a BTS, care should be taken to define when the reference was valid. We probably do need to require some sort of "accessed on" date for not just these web resources, but any web citation. This is probably second nature to you, Josiah, but we've never made dating of web references required here.
