User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4139960-20130129190934/@comment-188432-20130131052636: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Well, this isn't a one-size-fits-all thing. If you're talking about ''general'' web citation, maybe it's time to ''require'' {{tlx|cite web}}. | Well, this isn't a one-size-fits-all thing. If you're talking about ''general'' web citation, maybe it's time to ''require'' {{tlx|cite web}}. | ||
Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
But we ''first'' have to decide whether we're agreed that in-universe websites are invalid for the writing of in-universe articles. | But we ''first'' have to decide whether we're agreed that in-universe websites are invalid for the writing of in-universe articles. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129190934-4139960/20130131052636-188432]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 23:29, 27 April 2023
Well, this isn't a one-size-fits-all thing. If you're talking about general web citation, maybe it's time to require {{cite web}}.
For these in-universe websites, you could use {{cite web}} or you could say — if we decide that they can only be in BTS sections — "According to the version of the <whatever> web site that was available in 2007, such and such is true." We could repeal the whole WEB prefix, forcing people to use some sort of sentence construction that mentioned a date.
But we first have to decide whether we're agreed that in-universe websites are invalid for the writing of in-universe articles.