User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4139960-20130129190934/@comment-188432-20130131052636: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4139960-20130129190934/@comment-188432-20130131052636'''
Well, this isn't a one-size-fits-all thing.  If you're talking about ''general'' web citation, maybe it's time to ''require'' {{tlx|cite web}}.
Well, this isn't a one-size-fits-all thing.  If you're talking about ''general'' web citation, maybe it's time to ''require'' {{tlx|cite web}}.


Line 5: Line 4:


But we ''first'' have to decide whether we're agreed that in-universe websites are invalid for the writing of in-universe articles.
But we ''first'' have to decide whether we're agreed that in-universe websites are invalid for the writing of in-universe articles.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129190934-4139960/20130131052636-188432]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 23:29, 27 April 2023

Well, this isn't a one-size-fits-all thing. If you're talking about general web citation, maybe it's time to require {{cite web}}.

For these in-universe websites, you could use {{cite web}} or you could say — if we decide that they can only be in BTS sections — "According to the version of the <whatever> web site that was available in 2007, such and such is true." We could repeal the whole WEB prefix, forcing people to use some sort of sentence construction that mentioned a date.

But we first have to decide whether we're agreed that in-universe websites are invalid for the writing of in-universe articles.