User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-6032121-20190210202018: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Fair enough. To be clear, the "poppycock" comment referred to the suggestion to continue treating the two Romanas III as one incarnation; I think this thread has moved on from ''that'' at least. The question of what to do with "Trey" was another question, which I admitted was thornier. | Fair enough. To be clear, the "poppycock" comment referred to the suggestion to continue treating the two Romanas III as one incarnation; I think this thread has moved on from ''that'' at least. The question of what to do with "Trey" was another question, which I admitted was thornier. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
This is a very pleasant result, because if "Trey" and the Landau Romana are one and the same, then I believe we get to name the Landau Romana page "Trey", preserving the "Romana III" page for the novels' version. No cumbersome dabbing required. Correct? | This is a very pleasant result, because if "Trey" and the Landau Romana are one and the same, then I believe we get to name the Landau Romana page "Trey", preserving the "Romana III" page for the novels' version. No cumbersome dabbing required. Correct? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20150311013943-43908/20190210202018-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:35, 27 April 2023
Fair enough. To be clear, the "poppycock" comment referred to the suggestion to continue treating the two Romanas III as one incarnation; I think this thread has moved on from that at least. The question of what to do with "Trey" was another question, which I admitted was thornier.
Anyway, yes, your assessment seems quite sound to me. I did want to make sure we had no information on the subject, though; recall the earlier discussion of a quote which seemed like it said that Romana had lived on into an 8th incarnation at the least. But it looks like there isn't.
This is a very pleasant result, because if "Trey" and the Landau Romana are one and the same, then I believe we get to name the Landau Romana page "Trey", preserving the "Romana III" page for the novels' version. No cumbersome dabbing required. Correct?
