User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-44988386-20200623185848/@comment-6032121-20200624223620: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-44988386-20200623185848/@comment-6032121-20200624223620'''
I tried putting together a sandbox using an image from the Supreme from Series 4, but I can't figure out where the mage variable goes in the source code of this template for some reason (help, anyone?), so I ended up faking it via Photoshop.  
I tried putting together a sandbox using an image from the Supreme from Series 4, but I can't figure out where the mage variable goes in the source code of this template for some reason (help, anyone?), so I ended up faking it via Photoshop.  


Line 5: Line 4:
[[File:Explain. Explain! Demo for Thread-276659.jpg|center|590px]]
[[File:Explain. Explain! Demo for Thread-276659.jpg|center|590px]]
(@Jack: The ''Massacre'' line is a neat find, but yeah, I'm afraid it's not "iconic" enough for this sort of thing, I think.)
(@Jack: The ''Massacre'' line is a neat find, but yeah, I'm afraid it's not "iconic" enough for this sort of thing, I think.)
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200623185848-44988386/20200624223620-6032121]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 23:40, 27 April 2023

I tried putting together a sandbox using an image from the Supreme from Series 4, but I can't figure out where the mage variable goes in the source code of this template for some reason (help, anyone?), so I ended up faking it via Photoshop.

Still, should give you some idea:

Explain. Explain! Demo for Thread-276659.jpg

(@Jack: The Massacre line is a neat find, but yeah, I'm afraid it's not "iconic" enough for this sort of thing, I think.)