User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45692830-20200511054726/@comment-45692830-20200511072539: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does [[The Zygon Isolation (webcast)]] tell us that the icon used refers to [[Doctor Who Magazine (The Thief of Sherwood)]]? By a strict reading of [[T:NO RW]] we just can't make this connection based on what we're presented. Obviously it is. I'm all in favor for making these new pages and handling it in the normal way, and I'd prefer a much looser reading of [[T:NO RW]] than I'm pointing out here. But there's quite a lot of ambiguity being thrown at us at once. (And once again I'd love someone with a more conservative mindset to weigh in so I'm not forced to play devil's advocate.) | Does [[The Zygon Isolation (webcast)]] tell us that the icon used refers to [[Doctor Who Magazine (The Thief of Sherwood)]]? By a strict reading of [[T:NO RW]] we just can't make this connection based on what we're presented. Obviously it is. I'm all in favor for making these new pages and handling it in the normal way, and I'd prefer a much looser reading of [[T:NO RW]] than I'm pointing out here. But there's quite a lot of ambiguity being thrown at us at once. (And once again I'd love someone with a more conservative mindset to weigh in so I'm not forced to play devil's advocate.) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200511054726-45692830/20200511072539-45692830]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:45, 27 April 2023
Does The Zygon Isolation (webcast) tell us that the icon used refers to Doctor Who Magazine (The Thief of Sherwood)? By a strict reading of T:NO RW we just can't make this connection based on what we're presented. Obviously it is. I'm all in favor for making these new pages and handling it in the normal way, and I'd prefer a much looser reading of T:NO RW than I'm pointing out here. But there's quite a lot of ambiguity being thrown at us at once. (And once again I'd love someone with a more conservative mindset to weigh in so I'm not forced to play devil's advocate.)
