User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-55646-20130411174713: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-55646-20130411174713'''
{{retitle|The Panopticon/Capitalisation}}
I was wondering, was there any debate over whether terms "First Doctor", "Second Doctor", etc., should be capitalized.  The terms are never used on-screen and rarely in-story, and when I have seen them, it's with a lower case (though I can't say I have read all the books).  If this has been debated, sorry for the question.  Is there a link to such? {{retitle|///Capitalisation}}
I was wondering, was there any debate over whether terms "First Doctor", "Second Doctor", etc., should be capitalized.  The terms are never used on-screen and rarely in-story, and when I have seen them, it's with a lower case (though I can't say I have read all the books).  If this has been debated, sorry for the question.  Is there a link to such?  
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130411174713-55646]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 23:51, 27 April 2023

I was wondering, was there any debate over whether terms "First Doctor", "Second Doctor", etc., should be capitalized. The terms are never used on-screen and rarely in-story, and when I have seen them, it's with a lower case (though I can't say I have read all the books). If this has been debated, sorry for the question. Is there a link to such?