User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-68.146.70.124-20130821201844/@comment-26975268-20130822002603: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-68.146.70.124-20130821201844/@comment-26975268-20130822002603'''
Yes, we do cover magazine issues and will most likely create a page for [[DWM 464]] in the near future, but we will definitely censor any information that contravenes our [[T:SPOIL|spoiler policy]]. Anything completely centred around particular spoilers will not have a page yet obviously, but DWM 464 I'm sure has other, valuable articles in it.
Yes, we do cover magazine issues and will most likely create a page for [[DWM 464]] in the near future, but we will definitely censor any information that contravenes our [[T:SPOIL|spoiler policy]]. Anything completely centred around particular spoilers will not have a page yet obviously, but DWM 464 I'm sure has other, valuable articles in it.


Line 7: Line 6:


Also, you can edit your posts if you want, instead of correcting a mistake in another reply. The button's under "more". :)
Also, you can edit your posts if you want, instead of correcting a mistake in another reply. The button's under "more". :)
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130821201844-68.146.70.124/20130822002603-26975268]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 00:07, 28 April 2023

Yes, we do cover magazine issues and will most likely create a page for DWM 464 in the near future, but we will definitely censor any information that contravenes our spoiler policy. Anything completely centred around particular spoilers will not have a page yet obviously, but DWM 464 I'm sure has other, valuable articles in it.

Despite what you might think, this is not just bureaucracy. Some people I know managed to avoid any mention of the next Doctor up until now, and I'm sure they would like to keep it that way.

Besides, as it says every time you edit here now, we care about the Doctor's past, not his future. Would it be so difficult to respect those who are trying their best to avoid spoilers, by not posting them here? Lots of people would appreciate it. Thank you.

Also, you can edit your posts if you want, instead of correcting a mistake in another reply. The button's under "more". :)