User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-7302713-20130426143358/@comment-188432-20130426185445: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shambala is completely right, save for the words ''make a page''. Please '''do not create''' [[Battle of Bellatrix dating conflict]]. | Shambala is completely right, save for the words ''make a page''. Please '''do not create''' [[Battle of Bellatrix dating conflict]]. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
(Example: [[Susan Foreman#Early life on Gallifrey]]) | (Example: [[Susan Foreman#Early life on Gallifrey]]) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130426143358-7302713/20130426185445-188432]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:10, 28 April 2023
Shambala is completely right, save for the words make a page. Please do not create Battle of Bellatrix dating conflict.
The only dating conflict that gets a page is UNIT dating controversy, because that is a fan debate that can be referenced with multiple valid out-of-universe sources. Importantly, the name itself can be found in valid sources. If there are examples of other such pages, they almost certainly should be deleted, as they're fanwank.
It's extremely unlikely that there are any valid sources that give a damn about the date of the Battle of Bellatrix. So you do as Shambala suggested and add a few lines suggesting doubt as to the dates. "According to once source", "Another source had it that", "Some sources felt X, while others felt Y". That sort of thing.
But you definitely keep it on Battle of Bellatrix.
(Example: Susan Foreman#Early life on Gallifrey)
