User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-88790-20121208143712/@comment-1272640-20170810012918: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-88790-20121208143712/@comment-1272640-20170810012918'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
NateBumber wrote:
NateBumber wrote:
Line 19: Line 18:


If the author says he has permission to use Venus, and Obverse is trusting him, what reason for doubt do we have that he's lying? Seems a bit unfair to me.
If the author says he has permission to use Venus, and Obverse is trusting him, what reason for doubt do we have that he's lying? Seems a bit unfair to me.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121208143712-88790/20170810012918-1272640]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 00:16, 28 April 2023

NateBumber wrote: So, to recap:

  • This isn't intended by the series' authors to be some kind of one-way connection: in a Faction Paradox novel by the author of a Señor 105 novella, a character has a vision of a scene with Rodrigo from a Señor 105 short story by another author. Even more directly, Señor 105 has appeared alongside the Fourth and Sixth Doctors in charity stories written by Señor 105 authors; obviously these stories aren't valid, but they clearly indicate that said authors see the Señor as existing in the same universe as the Doctor.
  • Yes, the creator said on Facebook that the series probably isn't relevant to a Doctor Who Wiki, but he's also personally written (since-deleted) articles about it here; besides, there's no reason to think that he knows anything about the four little rules, so an opinion about whether it belongs on the wiki isn't an opinion about whether it's set in the universe. (See all of the above evidence.)

Am I missing anything? This debate has been open for literally five years; I think it's about time for us to wind it down and give Señor 105 the coverage it deserves.

Earlier, people were suggesting that we couldn't take the creator at his word, to which I say:

If the author says he has permission to use Venus, and Obverse is trusting him, what reason for doubt do we have that he's lying? Seems a bit unfair to me.