User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-9435571-20130724194223/@comment-9435571-20130812220352: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-9435571-20130724194223/@comment-9435571-20130812220352'''
Also, given that Ainley reverts to Beevers and then becomes Tipple at some point, I don't see how him possessing another body then is any less likely than possessing one after TVM. McQueen could even be meant to be the same incarnation as Tipple.
Also, given that Ainley reverts to Beevers and then becomes Tipple at some point, I don't see how him possessing another body then is any less likely than possessing one after TVM. McQueen could even be meant to be the same incarnation as Tipple.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130724194223-9435571/20130812220352-9435571]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 00:20, 28 April 2023

Also, given that Ainley reverts to Beevers and then becomes Tipple at some point, I don't see how him possessing another body then is any less likely than possessing one after TVM. McQueen could even be meant to be the same incarnation as Tipple.