User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-1272640-20161223194523: Difference between revisions
m (SOTO moved page User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-1272640-20161223194523 to User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates 1/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-1272640-20161223194523: Preparing for split. Edit history will be retained at Inclusion debates 1.) |
m (SOTO moved page User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates 1/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-1272640-20161223194523 to User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-1272640-20161223194523 over redirect: I didn't want subpages moved.) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 03:18, 4 May 2023
DENCH-and-PALMER wrote:
Pluto2 wrote:
DENCH-and-PALMER wrote: The Web of Caves according to DWM 285 is intended to be set within the DWU, the numbering of Gatiss' incarnation was never stated either off or on screen. It was intended to be tongue-in-cheek. What do people think about the validity of this story?
NOTE: After giving it the old rewatch, it appears to be more serious the Gatiss' other scripts such as Robot of Sherwood.
Fine by me. Valid.
I like to think so too. Authorial intent is that it's the DWU. Which others do you believe should be valid?
Among all of them? Rescue (short story), Bodyswap to the Proms, and Daleks v Vodafone (the creators even said it was a story, not an advert!). I also feel the Unbounds and Shalka should be valid, but Shalka is a discussion for another time.
