User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-20607870-20161222111703: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (SOTO moved page User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-20607870-20161222111703 to User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates 1/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-20607870-20161222111703: Preparing for split. Edit history will be retained at Inclusion debates 1.) |
m (SOTO moved page User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates 1/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-20607870-20161222111703 to User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1272640-20161222064850/@comment-20607870-20161222111703 over redirect: I didn't want subpages moved.) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 03:18, 4 May 2023
Thefartydoctor wrote: And no, it doesn't pass rule 4. We don't know where Moffat stands on the issue. If you have a source, feel free to post it. Until then, it doesn't pass rule 4 and thus isn't valid haha.
Usually when it's on the BBC and nothing has been stated otherwise and it breaks no other rule it's then considered a valid source.
