User talk:PintlessMan: Difference between revisions
PintlessMan (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:: 2. This is close to a textbook [[T:POINT]] breach — not its side-application for "don't restart old topics without new evidence" but the actual core policy of "don't disrupt this Wiki's function to make a point": here, trying to highjack a discussion pertaining to a completely different edit as an opportunity for activism on an unrelated issue. Please don't do this. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 11:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC) | :: 2. This is close to a textbook [[T:POINT]] breach — not its side-application for "don't restart old topics without new evidence" but the actual core policy of "don't disrupt this Wiki's function to make a point": here, trying to highjack a discussion pertaining to a completely different edit as an opportunity for activism on an unrelated issue. Please don't do this. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 11:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::3. When you start a conversation with someone you have known socially for years and they reply with an obvious joke, it's pretty weird and rude to respond by threatening them with your admin powers via a bulleted list. Honestly, just ban me at this point. I'm done, this has finished me. You can wonder about the Gods for the rest of aeternity. [[User:PintlessMan|PintlessMan]] [[User talk:PintlessMan#top|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC) | :::3. When you start a conversation with someone you have known socially for years and they reply with an obvious joke, it's pretty weird and rude to respond by threatening them with your admin powers via a bulleted list. Honestly, just ban me at this point. I'm done, this has finished me. You can wonder about the Gods for the rest of aeternity. [[User:PintlessMan|PintlessMan]] [[User talk:PintlessMan#top|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: That more impersonal tone is the price of having this interaction on the Wiki. I ''am'' an administrator — if a remark is the sort of thing which, from a complete stranger, would prompt a warning about policy, then surely you see that it would be totally improper for me to refrain from making that warning just because I have a long-standing acquaintance with the particular user I'm talking to! | |||
:::: Also, as you've indeed known each other socially for some time now, surely you know me well enough by now to ''expect'' that bringing up the Keller Master and showily not answering my question would ''annoy'' me. Nothing so very strange, methinks, about someone reacting with a degree of coldness if they came to you with an earnest question, and you decided to push their buttons instead while ignoring the question! [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 14:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:14, 10 July 2023
Thanks for your recent edits! I'm Jimbo, your robot wiki representative! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is actually a great time to have joined, because we're now fully independent, and working on a host of new features!
We've got a couple of important quirks for a fan written wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.
British English, please
We generally use British English 'round these parts, so if you use another form of English, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:
- the listing of all our help, policy and guideline pages
- our Manual of Style
- our image use policy
- our user page policy
If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! — you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:
Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask an admin.
Different meaning of "god"?[[edit source]]
Regarding your edit at The Master (Terror of the Autons): you're obviously right to hew to the stylisation used in the source, but what "different meaning" do you have in mind? Surely with "a", it would only ever refer to "a g(G)od" in the sense of "a deity", as opposed to, I guess, the Abrahamic God. You'd have to say "the bearing of God", surely, for that to be the implication. It seems entirely unremarkable to me to capitalise "God" even when it is used as a 'species name', much as one might capitalise Angel or Genie or Ogre. Or am I missing some other thing? Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 10:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Move the page to Keller Master and I'll illumine for you each orielled nook of the metacosm. PintlessMan ☎ 10:38, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- 1. You're supposed to reply on the other person's talk page, not your own.
- 2. This is close to a textbook T:POINT breach — not its side-application for "don't restart old topics without new evidence" but the actual core policy of "don't disrupt this Wiki's function to make a point": here, trying to highjack a discussion pertaining to a completely different edit as an opportunity for activism on an unrelated issue. Please don't do this. Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 11:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- 3. When you start a conversation with someone you have known socially for years and they reply with an obvious joke, it's pretty weird and rude to respond by threatening them with your admin powers via a bulleted list. Honestly, just ban me at this point. I'm done, this has finished me. You can wonder about the Gods for the rest of aeternity. PintlessMan ☎ 12:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- That more impersonal tone is the price of having this interaction on the Wiki. I am an administrator — if a remark is the sort of thing which, from a complete stranger, would prompt a warning about policy, then surely you see that it would be totally improper for me to refrain from making that warning just because I have a long-standing acquaintance with the particular user I'm talking to!
- Also, as you've indeed known each other socially for some time now, surely you know me well enough by now to expect that bringing up the Keller Master and showily not answering my question would annoy me. Nothing so very strange, methinks, about someone reacting with a degree of coldness if they came to you with an earnest question, and you decided to push their buttons instead while ignoring the question! Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 14:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)