Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,180
edits
More actions
Forum:Coverage/validity: In the Domain of the Daleks (edit)
Revision as of 20:25, 17 September 2023
, 17 September 2023no edit summary
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
Yeah, I think this'd definitely qualify for valid coverage. I'm not quite sure how it where you'd cover it, though. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">š¢</span>]]Ā 20:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC) | Yeah, I think this'd definitely qualify for valid coverage. I'm not quite sure how it where you'd cover it, though. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">š¢</span>]]Ā 20:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Sure it's a work of fiction. Why wouldn't it be? It'sā¦ rather more difficult to figure out what the ''medium'' is, which would be rather necessary whether it's valid or invalid. "(game)"? [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|ā]] 20:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC) | |||