Forum:Blocking / Restricting Users: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(New page: {{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> Just wondering what out procedure is for warning and blockin...) |
(+reply) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Just wondering what out procedure is for warning and blocking vandals? | Just wondering what out procedure is for warning and blocking vandals? | ||
I draw your attention to [[Special:Contributions/194.83.12.5]], while I would have put it down to random vandalism this is the third time from this IP address. It's also not just that he/she is doing it to current (and therefore) revertible articles, it's that they're creating new articles. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | I draw your attention to [[Special:Contributions/194.83.12.5]], while I would have put it down to random vandalism this is the third time from this IP address. It's also not just that he/she is doing it to current (and therefore) revertible articles, it's that they're creating new articles. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I recommend warning him/her/it/''pel kasa kree savak'' on his/her/its/''(how am I supposed to know? I don't speak [[Sycoraxic]])'' talk page, and then have an admin block him/her/it/''e.t.c'' - most likely me, as I'm the most frequent one to visit here. {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 14:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:49, 2 May 2007
Index → Panopticon → Blocking / Restricting Users
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Just wondering what out procedure is for warning and blocking vandals?
I draw your attention to Special:Contributions/194.83.12.5, while I would have put it down to random vandalism this is the third time from this IP address. It's also not just that he/she is doing it to current (and therefore) revertible articles, it's that they're creating new articles. --Tangerineduel 12:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)