Trusted
34,029
edits
More actions
no edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
:: (Regarding R4BP, I do feel compelled to clarify that [[User:Bongolium500]] ''is'' set to close ''that ''one already, once we all agree that we have nothing more to say under the present paradigm… which hasn't happened yet. I'm still chipping away at something. Just… busy. And maybe I'll be a little less o'er-busy once Nate is an admin!) [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 20:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC) | :: (Regarding R4BP, I do feel compelled to clarify that [[User:Bongolium500]] ''is'' set to close ''that ''one already, once we all agree that we have nothing more to say under the present paradigm… which hasn't happened yet. I'm still chipping away at something. Just… busy. And maybe I'll be a little less o'er-busy once Nate is an admin!) [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 20:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::(Oh, I'm sure, no pressure on Nate to be the closer. My point was the absurd length that threads can get to.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC) | :::(Oh, I'm sure, no pressure on Nate to be the closer. My point was the absurd length that threads can get to.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
I actually have similar concerns. I think I support but on the request that Nate does not close forums that involve rules that they have created - for instance, Nate would not close a forum about [[NOTCOVERED]] policy. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 21:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Bureaucrats == | == Bureaucrats == | ||