Talk:Doctor Who TARDISposting: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::I feel, though, that we are focusing on entirely the wrong thing here. Forum [[Gallifrey Base]] has zero sources cited, and the immensely influential [[Rec.arts.drwho]] has only one singular source cited. If we truly want to live up to the standards we are setting on the TARDISposting group, we must be willing to put in the work to cite sources on those pages as well. Though, at present, no one has felt the need to address the lack of sources for those two examples. Only TARDISposting. | ::I feel, though, that we are focusing on entirely the wrong thing here. Forum [[Gallifrey Base]] has zero sources cited, and the immensely influential [[Rec.arts.drwho]] has only one singular source cited. If we truly want to live up to the standards we are setting on the TARDISposting group, we must be willing to put in the work to cite sources on those pages as well. Though, at present, no one has felt the need to address the lack of sources for those two examples. Only TARDISposting. | ||
::This isn't even getting into the fact that, from my observation, TARDISposting is among the top five Facebook Doctor Who groups with the most members. They have a little under half the userbase of Gallifrey Base, and this current group has only been around for nearly four years. Gallifrey Base, in contrast, has been around for a decade and a half. Nearly fifteen years, vs. not even four years, and it's already coming close to half the users. This illustrates the point of TARDISposting's massive reach in the fandom space, which I believe shows its relevance perfectly. | ::This isn't even getting into the fact that, from my observation, TARDISposting is among the top five Facebook ''Doctor Who'' groups with the most members. They have a little under half the userbase of Gallifrey Base, and this current group has only been around for nearly four years. Gallifrey Base, in contrast, has been around for a decade and a half. Nearly fifteen years, vs. not even four years, and it's already coming close to half the users. This illustrates the point of TARDISposting's massive reach in the fandom space, which I believe shows its relevance perfectly. | ||
::I see no issue with this page remaining up. However, to delete it would be tantamount to erasing the massive contributions the group has made in fandom. Popularizing the "Don't forget to subscribe to the official Doctor Who YouTube channel" meme, which has carried over from Capaldi to every other Doctor since, is one such example, but by no means is it a fluke. | ::I see no issue with this page remaining up. However, to delete it would be tantamount to erasing the massive contributions the group has made in fandom. Popularizing the "Don't forget to subscribe to the official Doctor Who YouTube channel" meme, which has carried over from Capaldi to every other Doctor since, is one such example, but by no means is it a fluke. | ||
::Please keep this page up. If anything, expand it.[[User:LilPotato|LilPotato]] [[User talk:LilPotato|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] | ::Please keep this page up. If anything, expand it. [[User:LilPotato|LilPotato]] [[User talk:LilPotato|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] | ||
Revision as of 00:23, 15 April 2024
Deletion
I agree with the deletion tag. Unless some sources can be found explaining "TARDISposting"'s relevance, I will delete it. Bongo50 ☎ 11:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- The relevance is, in fact, heavily understated on the page. The original Scongo image was featured in a Rings of Akhaten card made by one Andy Hauser for the express purpose of creating more standalone Scongo cards for the Worlds Apart NFT game.[1] Andy is a former designer for Reality+, the developer of Worlds Apart. [2]
- Besides any of that, the group was deleted years ago due to mass reporting from trolls, as stated in the description, so unfortunately the sources for the many major actors in Doctor Who supporting the group have since been lost to time. Needless to say, that area of the page can and should be removed.
- I feel, though, that we are focusing on entirely the wrong thing here. Forum Gallifrey Base has zero sources cited, and the immensely influential Rec.arts.drwho has only one singular source cited. If we truly want to live up to the standards we are setting on the TARDISposting group, we must be willing to put in the work to cite sources on those pages as well. Though, at present, no one has felt the need to address the lack of sources for those two examples. Only TARDISposting.
- This isn't even getting into the fact that, from my observation, TARDISposting is among the top five Facebook Doctor Who groups with the most members. They have a little under half the userbase of Gallifrey Base, and this current group has only been around for nearly four years. Gallifrey Base, in contrast, has been around for a decade and a half. Nearly fifteen years, vs. not even four years, and it's already coming close to half the users. This illustrates the point of TARDISposting's massive reach in the fandom space, which I believe shows its relevance perfectly.
- I see no issue with this page remaining up. However, to delete it would be tantamount to erasing the massive contributions the group has made in fandom. Popularizing the "Don't forget to subscribe to the official Doctor Who YouTube channel" meme, which has carried over from Capaldi to every other Doctor since, is one such example, but by no means is it a fluke.
