Forum:Small images in infoboxes: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with '{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> Minor aesthetic question here. It's standard pract…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
Minor aesthetic question here. It's standard practice to scale images down to 250px in, for example, [[:Template:Infobox Individual]]. However, should that also apply to scaling up images which are smaller than 250px wide, despite the quality loss? Compare [http://tardis.wikia.com/index.php?title=Dracula&oldid=379454 this] and [http://tardis.wikia.com/index.php?title=Dracula&oldid=337417 this]. Thoughts? [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 00:10, June 14, 2010 (UTC) | Minor aesthetic question here. It's standard practice to scale images down to 250px in, for example, [[:Template:Infobox Individual]]. However, should that also apply to scaling up images which are smaller than 250px wide, despite the quality loss? Compare [http://tardis.wikia.com/index.php?title=Dracula&oldid=379454 this] and [http://tardis.wikia.com/index.php?title=Dracula&oldid=337417 this]. Thoughts? [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 00:10, June 14, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Preferably a higher res image should be found. Practically though, it's a stylistic choice. 250px is the standard, but given the small amount of information on the article scaling the image up doesn't really add to the article. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:10, June 15, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:10, 15 June 2010
Index → Panopticon → Small images in infoboxes
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Minor aesthetic question here. It's standard practice to scale images down to 250px in, for example, Template:Infobox Individual. However, should that also apply to scaling up images which are smaller than 250px wide, despite the quality loss? Compare this and this. Thoughts? Rob T Firefly 00:10, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Preferably a higher res image should be found. Practically though, it's a stylistic choice. 250px is the standard, but given the small amount of information on the article scaling the image up doesn't really add to the article. --Tangerineduel 14:10, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
