Talk:Impersonation: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
JSmith5504 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I mean, the ''Romans'' example doesn't use the actual word, just for instance, so that should go at bare minimum. (Part of the problem here is that [[Forum:Loosening T:NO RW]] is due to be closed, as everything is just in limbo.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC) | :I mean, the ''Romans'' example doesn't use the actual word, just for instance, so that should go at bare minimum. (Part of the problem here is that [[Forum:Loosening T:NO RW]] is due to be closed, as everything is just in limbo.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Oh, absolutely. That's why I said "mostly". I'm also not sure about the {{cs|Revelation of the Daleks (novelisation)}} example, since I copied that from [[JJ33]] verbatim, but all the rest should be fine... ''if'' the principle holds. | |||
::[[User:JSmith5504|jsmith5504]]<sup>[[User talk:JSmith5504|talk to me]]</sup> 00:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:22, 5 July 2024
T:NO RW violation
Yeah, fair enough. I was mostly looking at the article for straight, but that's not a foolproof method if the actual policy disagrees.
Would it work to restructure this as a simple list of cases where the concept appears, like at handbag, for example? I was mostly careful to only use sources where the actual word is used. Or is anything more general than direct quotes a policy violation? I'm genuinely unsure.
jsmith5504talk to me 23:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- I mean, the Romans example doesn't use the actual word, just for instance, so that should go at bare minimum. (Part of the problem here is that Forum:Loosening T:NO RW is due to be closed, as everything is just in limbo.) Najawin ☎ 00:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, absolutely. That's why I said "mostly". I'm also not sure about the Revelation of the Daleks [+]Loading...["Revelation of the Daleks (novelisation)"] example, since I copied that from JJ33 verbatim, but all the rest should be fine... if the principle holds.
- jsmith5504talk to me 00:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
