Forum:Colours identification and merge proposal: Difference between revisions

Forum:Colours identification and merge proposal (view source)

Revision as of 05:40, 17 September 2024

882 bytes added , 17 September

Conclusion

Tangerineduel

Tech, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Suppressors, Administrators

68,671

edits

@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 :<del>Maybe I'm missing something, but [[Ruby (colour)]]'s lead is cited to TLoRS. I don't think the colour is even ''mentioned'' in that episode, much less described, which is leading me to wonder if there are other mis-cited examples on these pages?</del> - [[User:CodeAndGin|<span style="color:green" title="CodeAndGin">CodeAndGin</span>]] | [[User_talk:CodeAndGin|<span title="Talk to me">🗨</span>]] |  15:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 ::I was indeed missing something, my bad - [[User:CodeAndGin|<span style="color:green" title="CodeAndGin">CodeAndGin</span>]] | [[User_talk:CodeAndGin|<span title="Talk to me">🗨</span>]] |  16:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
+==Conclusion==
+A policy will be created based on the above-linked suggestions.
+A conjecture subheading will be added to the [[Tardis:Colour spectrum policy]] essentially citing  [[Template:Conjecture]] for the rare cases when defining a colour is difficult.
+*[[Template:Color]] will be deleted, as this gives false legitimacy, and also fails [[T:NO RW]].
+*Of the colour pages that get merged down into existing pages, those will be edit locked to prevent re-creation.
+A navbox will be added to all colour pages along the lines of this:
+{{Navfobox
+|header = Colour spectrum
+|t1     = [[Tardis:Colour spectrum policy]]
+|1      = For accurate coverage of <nowiki>{{PAGENAME}}</nowiki> all different instances of <nowiki>{{PAGENAME}}</nowiki> are collected here.
+}}
+--[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 05:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)